The uncanny pleasure of coincidence
Like lots of actual 19th century novels, most notably Charles Dickens’s, Heyday contains a few coincidences. OK, more than a few.
Dickens’s friend John Forster, a writer and editor himself, put it perfectly: “On the coincidences, resemblances, and surprises of life, Dickens liked especially to dwell, and few things moved his fancy so pleasantly. The world, he would say, was so much smaller than we thought; we were all so connected by fate without knowing it; people supposed to be far apart were so constantly elbowing each other; and to-morrow bore so close a resemblance to nothing half so much as yesterday.”
Since Carl Jung, we’ve called such meaningful real-life coincidences “synchronicity.” And just as Alfred Hitchcock famously said that movies are real life with the boring bits removed, movies and novels (and for that matter, pretty much all art) can also be real life with the boring bits removed and the extraordinary bits, including coincidence, emphasized.
Which is all a preface to my present book-tour visit to San Francisco. Here in the city where several of my novel’s major characters wind up, I received an email from someone I don’t know — a descendant of Nathaniel Prime, who had borrowed Heyday from her public library. Prime was a Wall Street banker in the first half of the 19th century, one of the richest men in New York. He and one of his sons are characters in my novel. His real-life descendant wrote wondering about my depiction of her great-great-great grandfather — was he truly a “scoundrel”? (Not so far as I know, I told her; in his case, since he is so little known today, I used extreme literary license.)
Most of what she told me about Nathaniel Prime I already knew from my research. What I certainly didn’t know was that he was “one of the most valuable acquaintances of Alexis de Tocqueville and [his partner] Gustave de Beaumont during their travels in the United States” in the 1830s, that he “entertained them in his home in Hell Gate” in present-day Queens, nor that his firm, Prime, Ward and King had “served their banking needs and forwarded their mail all over the country.”
Yet one of Heyday’s main characters, an entirely fictional Brit named Ben Knowles, has a cousin who is married to Tocqueville. And Prime, Ward and King serves as an American banker and mail-forwarder for Ben.
The moral of the story: existence is so thick with coincidence, only a small portion of which we get to glimpse, that even the most coincidence-riddled fiction probably understates its presence in real life.
Dear Mr. Andersen:
I am writing perhaps prematurely, as I have not read your book yet (though, whenever I have a few minutes at Union Station, I go to B. Dalton and read a random page or two.)
A mystical friend of mine claims that there are no coincidences; that the future is pre-determined, in which case the most outlandish mishaps and spectacular convergences are supposed to happen. He cited our own meeting as a case in point. The die was already cast; when we met, we were just marching in lock-step with fate.
Even in a fairly trivial sort of life, there seems to be a certain momentum not necessarily connected to the life itself, but part of something much larger. This lends a certain credence to the notion that everybody plays his part. Which may also give rise to a completely unorthodox sense of history, dunno.
At any rate, I’m thrilled that you’ve gone and dealt with a time and place that is very dear to me and can’t wait to have a go at the entire book, rather than the random page. I hated to see the New York that Twain, Whitman, and Melville saw disappear completely – when I lived there, that is. So many lost connections in a single building that goes quietly under! The only way we have to resurrect something with so little visible presence is to write about it. A book dealing with the past by a man who is so fully engaged in the present offers a fascinating paradox.
I listen to the show all the time. You seem to move between cultures, time periods, and personal eccentricities without blinking an eye.
Admiringly,
Brett Busang
Comment by Brett Busang — March 28, 2007 @ 12:11 am
Uhhh, fyi, he’s being a little too presumptuous with your excellence. Watch out.
More admiringly than Brett,
Joshie
Comment by cuttykurrty — January 12, 2008 @ 12:13 am