Comments on: The biggest jerk in the Senate? http://kurtandersen.com/blogwp/2007/02/28/the-biggest-jerk-in-the-senate/ Just another WordPress weblog Mon, 26 May 2008 00:46:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Gaius http://kurtandersen.com/blogwp/2007/02/28/the-biggest-jerk-in-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-156 Gaius Fri, 23 Mar 2007 10:02:44 +0000 http://kurtandersen.com/blogwp/?p=10#comment-156 Hillary's nomination will only bring out the conservative base in full force. She is a polarizer. Obama would be a better choice over Hillary, but he's too liberal to be elected nationally. Behind the scenes democratics are a little worried neither Hillary or Obama can win nationally. Hillary’s nomination will only bring out the conservative base in full force. She is a polarizer. Obama would be a better choice over Hillary, but he’s too liberal to be elected nationally.

Behind the scenes democratics are a little worried neither Hillary or Obama can win nationally.

]]> By: walter_kimbrough http://kurtandersen.com/blogwp/2007/02/28/the-biggest-jerk-in-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-124 walter_kimbrough Mon, 12 Mar 2007 02:39:31 +0000 http://kurtandersen.com/blogwp/?p=10#comment-124 "dreadful, phony cow" really elevates the political discourse. “dreadful, phony cow” really elevates the political discourse.

]]> By: damian lanigan http://kurtandersen.com/blogwp/2007/02/28/the-biggest-jerk-in-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-51 damian lanigan Mon, 05 Mar 2007 15:52:09 +0000 http://kurtandersen.com/blogwp/?p=10#comment-51 hillary must NOT be nominated. this dreadful, dreadful phony cow: http://www.ifilm.com/profile/breitbart/video/2829104 hillary must NOT be nominated. this dreadful, dreadful phony cow:

http://www.ifilm.com/profile/breitbart/video/2829104

]]> By: J. Gruber http://kurtandersen.com/blogwp/2007/02/28/the-biggest-jerk-in-the-senate/comment-page-1/#comment-15 J. Gruber Sat, 03 Mar 2007 14:34:00 +0000 http://kurtandersen.com/blogwp/?p=10#comment-15 It's a good thing my 90-year-old, protofeminist uncle isn't computer- (and therefore Net-) literate, or he'd be posting an apoplectic comment here, taking you to task for saying "Hillary vs. Obama" instead of "Hillary/Barack" or "Clinton/Obama." He isn't moved by the argument that it's still necessary to distinguish Hill from Bill, or the observations that S. Hussein became "Saddam" to distinguish him from the late king of Jordan and that America's Mayor is routinely referred to as "Rudy." And he'd insist that your subsequent gratuitous use of "Mrs. Clinton" proves him right. (The "gratuitous" would be my uncle's word, not mine, you understand. Yep, it's a good thing he couldn't read your blog entry.) On a different note, if you're talking candidates whom we'd be thrilled to elect, how 'bout Wellstone? It’s a good thing my 90-year-old, protofeminist uncle isn’t computer- (and therefore Net-) literate, or he’d be posting an apoplectic comment here, taking you to task for saying “Hillary vs. Obama” instead of “Hillary/Barack” or “Clinton/Obama.” He isn’t moved by the argument that it’s still necessary to distinguish Hill from Bill, or the observations that S. Hussein became “Saddam” to distinguish him from the late king of Jordan and that America’s Mayor is routinely referred to as “Rudy.” And he’d insist that your subsequent gratuitous use of “Mrs. Clinton” proves him right. (The “gratuitous” would be my uncle’s word, not mine, you understand. Yep, it’s a good thing he couldn’t read your blog entry.) On a different note, if you’re talking candidates whom we’d be thrilled to elect, how ’bout Wellstone?

]]>